http://lauragoodwin.org/folk.html
laura@lauragoodwin.org
SENSUOUS SADIE: You are a writer, activist and
sexual rights advocate in addition to being the leader of the
United Leatherfolk of Connecticut. What was the process that you
went through from becoming just another player to someone with a
finger in so many pies?
LAURA: "This may sound corny, but I felt
called to it. I have an active spiritual life, and through
atonement and prayer I felt myself being led by a divine hand to
be of service in this way."
SS: You have received a number of awards and
recognition. Which are the ones that mean the most to you, and
why?
L: "I believe I was most pleased with my
Pantheon award, because a woman who had been horrible to me was
up for the same award that year, and it was a fine 'in your
face!' to the likes of her. That, I feel, was the work of the
divine hand again."
SS: You are an avid BDSM columnist. Have you
considered publishing your columns?
L: "Oh, I have been published many times,
but I derive more satisfaction from publishing myself on the
Internet. It's much faster, I get a bigger audience, and I don't
have to deal with editors, some of whom are absolute
butchers."
SS: ULC has been under the same leadership
without crisis for your entire history. Considering the normal
strife of any organization, and the fact that BDSM groups seem
to really groove on power politicking, to what do you ascribe
this success?
L: "I've noticed that many club problems
arise not out of love of power, but out of a desire to control
the money, so I charge no membership fee. If there is no money
sitting around in a bank account, then people can't play
'Capture the Flag' with it, and have to find happier games.
My people are happy with my leadership. I meet
my member's most basic needs, and I'm dependable about it. If
they have a complaint they know they can simply talk to me, and
I get few complaints. What complaints I do get, I deal with
promptly."
SS: You say that most people at your play
parties don't have intercourse because people are "not that
exhibitionistic. "I tend to think of the entire play party
experience as one big theatrical exhibition. How do you
differentiate between sexual exhibitionism and BDSM
exhibitionism?
L: "I don't. They are the same thing.
I've learned that the people who enjoy playing in a public
environment do not represent the true majority in the BDSM
world. My experience has taught me that the majority of BDSM
people prefer to play and have sex privately, because to them,
sex - and anything relating to it - is a private matter. You
won't see those people in huge numbers at the public events.
They're very secretive, but nonetheless dedicated.
"As for why some people can play publicly
but not have sex publicly, it's for the same reason they are OK
about going skinny-dipping with friends as opposed to having sex
while your friends watch. It's a matter of degree. Many people
could do the first one but never the other. In fact, people who
can do one but not the latter I believe are the norm."
SS: You write, "BDSM relationships are
*sexual* relationships. Even if you never fuck, the whole point
of a BDSM relationship is kinky eroticism. People who say
otherwise really *worry* me. I mean, sadomasochism by definition
is sexual. If you take the sex out, it's not really s/m anymore.
"You have probably received some criticisms about this
statement. What's your response to the school of thought that
BDSM in its pure form is not about sex, but only about the power
exchange? Why do you think there is so much focus on the
non-sexual aspect of BDSM?
L: "Well, people who say that BDSM is not
about sex are simply unclear on the concept. Sadomasochism by
definition is an erotic paraphilia. Some sadomasochists don't
need intercourse or whatever to have orgasm, but that's because
they have substituted something else.
"There are some showboats who are so into
far-out pain-play or whatever that they set the sex aside
completely, but they are not better or purer in any way than the
rest of us are, they just like to think that they are. I feel
that saying that 'Pure BDSM is not about sex' is just a fancy
new way to say that sex is dirty, that sex dirties BDSM, which I
don't happen to agree about."
SS: You state, "Vanillas are not going to
support us in a fight to legalize pro domination, or the right
to drag each other around on leashes in front of their kids.
Make your peace with that fact. "What is your approach to
educating the general public about what we do? What do you see
as the optimal considering the limitations?
L: "I know for certain that vanillas can
and do support our rights to privacy, and to consent to BDSM,
but they are very turned off by the details. The less they know
about what we are doing, the better. If I were an opponent of
the movement, I would use the dirty details as a weapon to stir
up repugnance in public feeling. Vanillas don't like what we do:
that's what makes them vanilla. They have to be told only what
they need to know so they know what BDSM is. We have to
emphasize that people consent to these things knowingly, because
they think it makes for a fine personal adventure. We have to
emphasize that BDSM is in essence an erotic sport and therefore
a private matter. Us tying each other up isn't what bothers
them: THAT they understand. What they don't understand is the
more extreme forms such as bloodletting games. We can't expect
that they'll ever really understand that stuff. Even some of our
own people don't understand it.
"If you rent a mistress by the hour that
to them is prostitution. That's good. Let them think that way.
We don't want them thinking that they are not right when they
are. Let's be honest with ourselves and with the public about
pros for hire. Sex *is* going on in those sessions. BDSM is
sexual.
"It's very wrongheaded for people in the
BDSM community to keep trying to foist obvious falsehoods on the
public. If we want their friendship, we have to be a friend to
them, and be honest. Friends don't lie to each other. Vanillas
can handle the truth, but if they discover we haven't been
honest they will turn on us.
"Renting yourself out by the hour to whip
people is a form of sex work. No more bullshit, please. Sex work
in all its forms should be decriminalized, but that issue should
be a separate issue from BDSM rights. Hiring a pro is not the
same as one spouse spanking another as a prelude to sex. It's
just not."
SS: It's very common for novices to get into
that "submissive frenzy" thing and confuse casual play
with intimacy. Considering how the casual atmosphere of instant
partners and play parties encourages non-intimate relationships,
how would you advise people to find intimate BDSM relationships?
L: "An intimate relationship has to be
built up brick-by-brick. The frenzy you speak of is a normal,
human thing. Under the right circumstances, if all goes well, it
will happen very quickly. It's a beautiful thing, but it is not
true intimacy. Intimacy happens over time, through shared
experience and trial. The problem is people use the word
intimacy as a euphemism for sex. If people would simply
appreciate sex for what it is, and call it what it is, we'd be
less likely to see such confusions. I would like to see people
honoring sex more, and then they would feel less need to pretend
it's something it's not. To feel caught up in a sexual frenzy is
divine. There used to be whole religions built around that. I
would like to see a resurgence of ecstasy religions, and in fact
I think BDSM people are poised to lead such a resurgence.
Wouldn't that be grand!?"
SS: In one of your columns you write, "If
you are looking for love don't go whole hog on the first
fringing date. Don't buy expensive gifts or go renting motel
rooms before you even know each other." But of course you
probably know, since you had to say this in the first place,
that this happens all the time - often followed by
disappointment. How can novices keep their heads?
L: "By listening to their heads instead
of their genitals."
SS: You commented that, "Sex in a young
relationship is like trying to climb a sapling...it's too easy,
it won't get you very high, and it could ruin things for the
future." Geeze Laura, you're sounding like a real old
fashioned girl! Do you find that these kinds of ideas, which
incidentally I agree with, set you off somewhat in a community
that seems to value hedonism?
L: "Well, it's true I seem like an
oddball when compared with the 600 people who regularly turn up
at the big BDSM conventions, but those people are unusual. When
I'm compared with BDSM people at large who are 'out there'
playing in their bedrooms and basements all across our nation;
I'm in real good company. Compared to many of them, I'm pretty
progressive. There are many BDSM people who honestly believe
that this stuff should only occur between (heterosexual) husband
and wife. Many of them are not only homophobic, but they don't
even think single heterosexuals should be horsing around in this
manner. To them pro dominants are just fancy whores in fancy
underwear with fancy tricks. And big BDSM play parties are out
of the question: Sodom and Gomorrah. The punks taking over.
"People like Janet Hardy and John Warren
seem to think that all BDSM people who matter live on the
cutting edge of all social movements. They are wrong. They
address their books to people who represent a tiny and very
progressive faction. Most BDSM practitioners do not in fact
agree that Gays should have rights and that Prostitution should
be legal. Many BDSM people have been left out of the movement,
and their needs aren't being addressed, basically because they
fail these political litmus tests. Nevertheless, they are our
people, and they have to be taken care of somehow, or else we
aren't really serving the entire BDSM community."
SS: You write, "Some people very
perversely don't just go away after they scene/have sex with
you." I have certainly experienced this myself, as well as
heard the sad stories of my compatriots. Do you believe that
this happens because we played with the person too early?
L: "Basically, yes."
SS: Please tell me about your own BDSM
practice and how it has changed over time.
L: "I started out being rather brutal,
and I also felt, in the beginning, a big need to show off. I
have mellowed."
SS: Has your being such an activist also
affected what you do in your private life?
L: "I divorced one husband and married
another because of it. Because I became a public activist I had
to tell my children more than the average BDSM parent would.
Also, one of my brothers cut me out of his life over it. That
was a heartbreaker."
SS: You state that "we believe that
bondage and discipline, fantasy role-play, sensual
sadomasochism, erotic "torture" etc. Can be a
satisfying part of a well-balanced life. "How do you feel
that the lifestyle compliments and adds to your personal life?
L: "Well, I think of it more as something
that detracts from your life quite severely if you don't satisfy
the need. If you satisfy your need it's no big deal, but if you
don't, it just eats at you from within. I think it's much
healthier for leatherfolk to get their needs met. That's how it
becomes a positive part of a healthy life."
SS: I suspect that considering your very
public role (not to mention being something of a hottie), you
have submissives hitting on you right and left.
L: "No, that's not true. I have as much
trouble in finding a new partner as anybody else does."
SS: What do you look for in a submissive?
L: "Someone decent who turns me on, and
who likes my jokes."
SS: How would you characterize your
philosophical approach to the lifestyle?
L: "Enjoy yourself and stay out of
trouble."
SS: Where would you like to be in your BDSM
life in five years?
L: "Where I am now is good. I love my
slave husband and I have lots of adorable friends. If I can just
maintain this I'll be content."
SS: I am very interested in the spirituality
of BDSM and am exploring that. Could you please expand on how
you integrate this into your lifestyle? Can you suggest any
resources for more information?
L: "Spirituality is much more than an
interest to me. It's my entire motivation. It's where I am
coming from. I integrate every thing else in my life into my
spirituality. I feel myself to be Goddess-led. Her hand is upon
my heart at all times. I do not integrate my spirituality into
my life: my spirituality is my life.
"I was led to study the roots of sexual
oppression, to better understand how leatherfolk got into our
current predicament. I found out that the history of sexual
oppression is a very long one. The demonization of the Goddess
and the denigration of woman began thousands of years ago, when
patriarchal forces overthrew the old matriarchies. The attitude
that sex is dirty began then. Patriarchies depend on knowing who
the father is, so woman's sexual freedoms under the patriarchies
were severely curtailed. People who didn't toe the line were
severely punished, as they still are in many ways even today.
"That is where the double-standard began.
Men under the patriarchies always enjoyed more freedoms than the
women did. This is where the attitude that penetration =
dominance came from, and this attitude still is amazingly
prevalent. For example, many BDSM people believe that it's
inappropriate for a dominant of either sex to enjoy being
penetrated."
"That is where the attitude that sexual
freedom is bad began. Women and men enjoyed much sexual freedom
under matriarchal rule, but the Patriarchies stopped all of
that, mainly to control women (to know who the father was). Even
today, many people think that sex is bad, and that sexier sex
(example: BDSM) is worse.
"To undo the damage done, we have to heal
our relationship with nature, and that means to reclaim the
divinity of womanhood and the dignity of sex. Men and women have
to learn to accept, honor, and love our own sexual selves, and
we have to accept, honor, and love each other.
"Just being into BDSM doesn't do this
automatically. As has been seen, there are strong sexist and
puritanical forces even within the BDSM community. I see the
'BDSM is not necessarily sexual' attitude as a manifestation of
the same toxic Puritanism that has tainted vanilla sex
relations.
"I believe the patriarchal way of doing
things has run its course. Our problem now is to find a new way
of living that is more healthful, practical, and just. We can't
go back to the matriarchal way of doing things: we have to move
forward. That's what the Goddess has me working on now. What She
wants *you* to be working on is between you and Her.
"If you want to learn more about the
divine in your life, the best source for information and
inspiration is your own heart. Let the divine guide your hand
and heart, and you will be led to the books, the relationships,
and the other resources that are perfect for you."
SS: What hopes do you have for the community
at large?
L: "That it will continue to become more
of a true international nation - without boundaries and without
limits."
SS: It's no secret that you have a little
crush thingy on Captain Kirk of the original star trek series.
So as not to have this interview be incomplete, would you care
to expand on this? Any particular shows that had a nice BDSM
theme that you'd like to share with our readers?
L: "The best way for me to answer that
question is to invite people to my Silly Star Trek Obsession web
site:
http://allyourtrekarebelongto.us
SS: Just a side note that you
"hand-code" your website. With so many designers using
wysiwyg web design software, what do you feel that personal
coded touch has added to your website? Would you care to step on
the soapbox and educate those of us who are ignorant on the
beauties of hand coding?
L: "HTML is not difficult to learn, and
coding your own produces leaner, cleaner code. The web pages
load faster and you have more precise control over the
appearance and layout of your site. I admire the fancy-looking
web sites as much as anybody, but they are big bandwidth hogs.
Many people still access the net at 56K, and you have to be
concerned about the quality of their experience when they visit
your site.
'What You See Is What You Get' editors are
misnamed. You _don't see_ a lot of what you get, including
bloated, unnecessarily convoluted code. Plus, you end up with a
web site that is not distinctive looking. A web site that is
made with a cookie-cutter template lacks soul. It's like the
difference between polyester pants and blue jeans. I never was
satisfied to keep my car clean and shiny. I always have to
tinker under the hood. That's why I built my own computer, too.
I gave birth to my kids at home, too. I'm a real
do-it-yourselfer. I like to know what make things work, so I can
play with making it work better."
SS: Thank you very much!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UNITED LEATHERFOLK OF CT
A non-profit BDSM support/social group.
http://lauragoodwin.org/folk.html
laura@lauragoodwin.org
United Leatherfolk of CT (Pansexual) founded
in March 1990, is a non-profit support and social group for BDSM
men and women of all orientations. Intimate and very friendly.
Not public. No fees. Contact me via email if you wish to be
considered for membership. This club is especially welcoming and
helpful for singles and newbies, but enthusiasts at all levels
of development will be comfortable with us. Don't be alone in a
crowd: join ULC for the personal attention you need. Email Laura
Goodwin for membership info.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you enjoyed this interview, read more
SCENEprofiles with BDSM personalities on Sadie's website at www.sensuoussadie.com
Sensuous Sadie is a BDSM columnist and edits SCENEsubmissions,
a free e-newsletter. She is the founder and leader (1999 - 2001)
of Rose & Thorn, Vermont's first BDSM group. Comments,
compliments and complaints, as well as requests for reprinting
can be addressed to her at SensuousSadie@aol.com
or visit her website at www.sensuoussadie.com.
Sadie believes the universe is abundant and that sharing
information freely is part of this abundance, so she allows
reprints of her writing in most venues.
Copyright 2002