TopKnot@TopKnot.org
www.topknot.org
I am a Top. I have lately come to the
conclusion that I'm a Top because I'm not courageous enough to
be a bottom. However, I do like bottoms, and I often wonder
about their submission.
One of the things I came to realize is there
are distinctly two types of bottoms, "Feline" and
"Canine", dubbed after two of the most popular pets.
These are two broad generalizations and in no way should be
considered terms that cover all submissive behaviors. However, I
do think that most bottoms would be able to relate to one of the
two, or feel that they possess more characteristics of one type
than the other. It seems that these distinctions are very clear
in some bottoms, while more vague in others, but almost always
applicable.
The two different classes differ in their
drive and approach to bottoming, submission and pain. The Canine
submissive is aiming to please. He takes pride in being owned
and collared. The Canine sub looks for ways to please his owner,
and will enjoy and appreciate positive feedback for his actions.
The Canine sub focus is on his Dom. He will suffer pain to
please his Dom, offering it as a sacrifice.
The Feline submissive takes pride in his
ability to choose. He will offer his submission only to a Dom he
can appreciate. He will feel less at ease being owned or
collard, and will offer his submission in return of to the
gratification of his needs. The Feline sub uses pain as a
personal tool for personal growth, where the Dom serves as a
means to reach it.
A Feline submissive evaluates his relationship
with his Top according to the ability of his Top to provide to
his needs, both physical and mental. A Canine sub would tend to
evaluate it according to his ability to please his Top.
After a good long scene a Feline submissive
would be more likely to say something like: "Thank you
Master, that was so good!" while a Canine would be more
likely to say: "Thank you Master, I hope you liked
that!"
Since this is based on personal observation,
and not on any kind of research, I can only present the
following as reasonable assumptions, which aside from stirring
up some controversy, might lead to a further discussion. If any
empirical research were to be done, I would bet that these would
be some of its results: - When first met with their Dom partner,
most Feline made the "first move," while most Canines
reacted to courting of their Dom. - In a non-scene environment
most Feline submissives present more dominant and aggressive
characteristics than average people. - Most Switches will show
Feline tendencies when bottoming.
D is a 'switchable sub', by her own
definition. "I'm really more of a submissive, but I would
sub almost to no one, but my husband. When I play with others I
usually Top. I wouldn't let just anyone dominate me. … I need
to know that my Top is experienced and I can trust him. … In
that respect, I'm very 'feline'."
A is a 'bi-sexual slave'. While talking to him
about my perception he said: "I don't submit to anyone
either. When I do submit, I give everything I have to my Top.
It's simply to much effort to give to just anyone. … But yes,
I do feel that during a scene my main motive is to make my Top
happy. ... I'm little slave-bitch, ha?"
While my observations might provide
submissives a new notion about themselves, I write this mainly
as a tool for Tops. I hope it will increase the Tops' ability to
understand submissive behavior and motives and will allow better
interaction and connection with their bottoms.